Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[samurai7694]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I would like to collab (I have experience, FYI)

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I would like to collab (I have experience, FYI)

MMkay, just PM me your E-mail and some ways you can back up the experience..

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Already? What ever happened to "really slow progress"?

lots of C/P (not in a bad way)

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Oh, BTW, Any of you feel like Colabing on a "To you luv me I *** For you" File?

(Edit: Before i get pounced on for the "***" in the title, that's 3 asterics i actually typed, and not forum censoring. Nor is it an actual word. the "***" is part of the title)

Nevertheless, the use of the asterisks in the song title you gave is obviously suggestive. I wouldn't say it's a safe to submit the song.

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

While i totaly agree with you there, my only reason for not saying "Nope, probably not a good idea..." is that, even on T+Paz's myspace AND webiste, that's how the song title is written. So if that is the song's ACTUAL name, i figured it would be fine.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i'm still trying to figure out what the 3 asterisks are in place of.

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

maybe s e x, that's the only one that's at least partially logical.

[LJRoX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm willing to cut CHOCO if anyone's seriously considering stepping the song.

No ****, I'm doing CHOCO.

EDIT: Oh whoops, I don't know what you mean by cut.

But I'm seriously stepping the song and I'm not gonna rush it.

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

maybe s e x, that's the only one that's at least partially logical.

Yeah, and i've never heard of any forums/TV/books/whatever censoring that...

[LJRoX]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

sexsexsexsexsexsexsexsexsex

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

No ****, I'm doing CHOCO.

EDIT: Oh whoops, I don't know what you mean by cut.

But I'm seriously stepping the song and I'm not gonna rush it.

Well if you listen to CHOCO, the song repeats itself in the same manner for about 2/3rds of the way through. Before stepping it, it's better to shorten (i.e. cut) the song - I'd highly recommend it. I wouldn't want to have the song stepped in full.

[samurai7694]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I stepped GENTLEMAN by Venetian Snares for the next batch (cut starting at around 2:05 to the end because it says f*** and s*** right before that).

It was fun stepping it. Accurate 16th jacks at 174 BPM and overall fun file. It was difficult stepping the drums and snares but I managed to pull it off and step this song to my best ability so it turned out really well.

Definately an FGO. So, for the next batch, I have an FMO (Raging Terror) and an FGO (GENTLEMAN), both stepped accurately and played countless times over and over again. This might be my chance! :P

[Netjet!]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Aw, you didn't step gentleman as hard as you could :P There's room for 174BPM 64th rolls lol.

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

there's room for lots of **** but that doesn't mean it would make a good file

[Silver_Brian]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

there's room for lots of **** but that doesn't mean it would make a good file

this 64th trill fits in crowdpleaser, right guys?!?!?!