Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[Shashakiro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

SSH sucks.

stargroup, hi19, i think it's time for me to join the conspiracy

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

fuccen saitama saishuu heiki rofl


HEY TASS METS WON 9-3 NOW YOURE PHILLIES GET WRECKED BYE

[Netjet!]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

agreed. lol

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

stargroup, hi19, i think it's time for me to join the conspiracy

Look what you did now, Tass, look what you did.

protip: you don't mess with Shash's SSH

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

SSH AND Maiden.

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

stargroup, hi19, i think it's time for me to join the conspiracy

I've been hating tass since before it was cool :-/

[Shashakiro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

SSH AND Maiden.

metallica sux

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

oh noes. the claws are out now.

[CosmicRain]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I wonder if my files have been judged yet...

[Shashakiro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I wonder if my files have been judged yet...

2 files

6 [-]'s

[hi19hi19]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

ouch

[CosmicRain]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

...what does that mean?... and isn't Tass the one who's judging?

[Redorigami]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

3 judges, 2 files, 6 [-]'s.

Do the math.

In case you're lazy: Your files sucked ass.

[Shashakiro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Haha, there are three judges.

These are the file ratings used right now, I wrote this up for maybe a sticky sometime:

[++] Reserved for real masterpieces or flawless files. Rare, rare rating. Same as [+] for the purposes of acceptance, although a file that gets this rating from any judge will almost certainly be accepted by all judges.
[+] File is accepted by the judge, maybe with minor suggestions. If 2/3 judges give this rating, the file will be played by Tass.
[#] The judge made the file. Identical to + for acceptance.
[+.] File is either weakly accepted due to being somewhat generic/uninteresting or is good enough for FFR but could use significant improvement. 2/3 files need this rating to get played by Tass, but he will be much more critical of them.
[+?] The file is decent overall but needs some important tweaks in certain areas, or has many small technical errors. Not accepted without changes.
[?] The file has potential, but needs significant reworking in order to be good enough for FFR. Not close to acceptance.
[-] The lowest rating that you will likely achieve. The file is basically pretty bad and needs to be completely redone, or the file was rejected for the following:
-A freeze arrow or mine was used anywhere in the file
-A significantly incorrect BPM was used
-A section of it was way, way, way too hard, like a wall of 64th quads or something similarly ridiculous
If any of the above are noticed, the judge has the right to immediately quit out and give the file a [-] rating, regardless of the quality of the rest of the file.
[<] The file was worth at least a [+.] rating, but there is already a better file for this song in the queue or in the batch, and the file is not suitable as a V2.
[!] The judge did not play the file for some reason, such as blatantly obvious permission issues (like anyone submitting a Led Zepplin file, for example), technical problems, or multiple difficulties in the file.
[--] kill yourself

[CosmicRain]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

3 judges, 2 files, 6 [-]'s.

Do the math.

In case you're lazy: Your files sucked ass.

Woah! Calm down Redorigami, I didn't know that was the case. I'm still new to this submissions and adding songs thing, so it's not like I'd know right away anyway... but you sound as if you were upset with me over something... what did I do anyway to upset you so much?

For Shashakiro: Thanks for the info!