Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[damanwithdaskillz]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

lol you didn't cheat hahaahahahahaahaha
nice try trying to prove the legitimacy of a balloon fever aaa with a REPLAY OF A ZEPHON BLACK FLAG. yes surely if you can get a replay of a zephon black flag, you can aaa an fmo. point taken, we're idiots.

I understand, it's just since my scores were wiped, that's the only really good new replay I have, I have a dot death AAA, but I've done that before, and everything before my scores were wiped everyone just ignores, so all the new scores you can pay attention too...whew....this sucks, I really didn't hack, the IP adresses don't even match, LD said they came from the same computer with the same IP, problem is, people get into my account all the time, even when I change my password, and I have a dynamic IP adress, no one can ever trace it, and this specific hacking adress was the same for over a month, I garauntee that if LD can get the hackers IP adress and compare it to mine, it will be different, that should be enough to prove it wasn't me...

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

stop it. all of you. daman cheats, stargroup apparently quit but didn't... and nobody else is helping.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

hehe it's time to unlock this thread I guess.

complaint please.

also updated the first post, the full queue list as of now.

[Silvuh]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Procrastination on Paper: -
- uh... has two charts

Sorry I didn't mention this earlier, but ignore the standard steps on Procrastination on a Paper.

Yeah, well, JX found something to fix, so I guess it doesn't matter... I was hoping it would be this one that got in if any...
And I don't really have anything else to say about the files, really. I don't mind that Quickdraw wasn't accepted, because I thought that the difficutly changes in it were a bit too dramatic (which is why the first file was all hard)... And, yeah, the Forsaken Neon (uncut) file had more 8th jacks, but they weren't in the stream and they went to the music... I could try making it even harder and stuff with jacks gone now, like Tass suggested... I still kinda feel like an ass, though, 'cause of the reason why I stepped it in the first place...
Yeah, uhm... I'll fix that one thing in Procrastination on a Paper and get someone to review it to help me fix other things we all missed...
I'll just hope that my Strawberry Sweetz file can make it in to the FMO batch...

[gnr61]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

oh my file was not played by anyone xD

[MilkChan]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Man I was a bit skeptical about those jacks in my file.

Guess I should revise and work on other files too.

[SulferDragon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Geez, wtf, I can't sync any of my files.

lol, I'm not going to cut The Rhythm of Life. It's already cut! It's normally a minute longer, and I don't see the issue with it. It's below three minutes, and at least it's not as boring as something like... Riddle Me a Rats Nest, which is also longer.

I'll work on the sync in Rise Up, and perhaps cut it.

I don't really see what's wrong with Chill Penguin, but whatever. I'll see what I can do =/

[behanjc]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Hutsu: +?
- The song is called Huutsu no Uta
Is that the only reason you rejected Rebirth?

Keep in Mind: +
- I might have to fix some sync errors in the end but its a really good file overall

Played by Tass but not queue'd
keep in mind - sync.

Tass rejected for sync, but Rebirth said he'd fix it. Can this be queued then, I thought it was my best.

Sync felt right for me anyway, but oh well.

EDIT: And to Rebirth, dBu's version is definitely called "the" Casket of Star, and I think I know the place you mean about the 32nds, and it definitely leads into the quarter as opposed to the quarter not preceding the 32nd

[Knoobish]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Sorry if I missed it, but was there a firm decision made on whether or not we are able to resubmit sims? I know the queue is closed until may for fmo/fgo songs and blah blah blah, but I don't recall seeing anything about resubmits.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i think, for now, no resubmits. give them a few months and you'll be able to.

[behanjc]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Tass, I'm going to send about 6 or 7 queued files, the only thing changed is that I added seconds of silence so the arrows will start right in FFR. Hope that's ok.

[robertsona]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

lol no files queue'd. and lol final fall. that file ruled.

[Rebirth0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Hutsu: +?
- The song is called Huutsu no Uta
Is that the only reason you rejected Rebirth?

No that's not the reason. Simfile probably had errors. I can't remember by now

EDIT: And to Rebirth, dBu's version is definitely called "the" Casket of Star, and I think I know the place you mean about the 32nds, and it definitely leads into the quarter as opposed to the quarter not preceding the 32nd

Oh.. maybe you're right. dBu does add "the" in the beginning of a bunch of his songs. I was just going off what I know from the ZUN version

[TK_pavonineukon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Rebirth:

Behind These Hazel Eyes: ?

The Euphoria: +?

A little explanation, please?

JX:

Behind These Hazel Eyes (dj-N Remix) (TK_pavonineukon) [+.] (5) - could be more PR tho

The Euphoria (TK_pavonineukon) [+.] (6) - felt notes aren't going with the melody at parts, could be more PR

What's PR?

If it's difficutly, I thought making the steps slightly easier would really fit well with the mood of the song, especially Behind These Hazel Eyes. If I made any of those harder, I probably would've just put in a bit more jumps here and there.

Which notes felt out of melody, if you would be kind enough to answer?

And, one more thing. Tass, didn't you say that if a file got 2 +'s you would test it? The Euphoria had two and the parts that were "wrong" with them were very miniscule, which is why I got a ? by both judges, too. I'm a little disappointed at the fact that tiny little mistakes, or errors in the judges eyes, will exempt my file out of being tested by Tass, since he has the final call, but if not playing my files or any others with +?'s was to help reduce the amount of files in the queue or the amount of files you had to test, then I guess judging is just getting much harsher now.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

PR = pitch relevency. Don't worry; I didn't know what that was before too. ^.^;

And when we do resubmit files for the summer, will they be judged differently than these last two batches? I believe I've already asked a similar question but it wasn't addressed.
For example, if a simfile was rejected from this batch because of a few jacks, will this be looked upon differently in future batches?