I don't like the idea of judging strictly just because you have a lot of files already accepted. Judging differently as a result of something that's completely uncontrollable, and something that's really to be expected with FFR's growth, seems pretty damn unfair to me.
Originally posted by KgZ
oh yeah girls love it when I stick my massive arm in their mouth
we'll judge however the hell we feel like it. we'll just stop telling you how we're doing it, cause no matter how we do it, some of you are going to complain.
we'll judge however the hell we feel like it. we'll just stop telling you how we're doing it, cause no matter how we do it, some of you are going to complain.
The problem I have is the fact that you change your judging criteria based off of something as arbitrary, expected and uncontrollable as "there's a lot of songs in the queue already".
I'm not getting into another one of these arguments though. Do whatever you want.
Originally posted by KgZ
oh yeah girls love it when I stick my massive arm in their mouth
well... i feel that length of queue IS an important factor. when the queue is only 5 songs deep, and we therefore only have enough songs for about 2 weeks worth... we have to be willing to take files of a lower caliber to guarentee that we'll have enough stuff to release.
BUT... since we're going to have around 100, if not more, and we keep getting in 15-20 files a week, then we have no reason NOT to make our judging stricter. it will give a better quality control on the future files released into the game, while at the same time allowing us to continue growing the queue at a manageable level.
should the time come when the queue goes back to 20 or so files, and we want to start filling it up more, we'd likely be slightly less strict again.
to me, it makes perfect sense. then again, i'm the judge, not the submitter.
well... i feel that length of queue IS an important factor.
Oh man, this brings back memories. I remember the last time when we had an argument about judging, you said that a queue quota was irrelevant to the nature of your judging. I guess things change when you get 200 submissions in a batch.
Nonetheless, I'm glad that you guys are implementing this "quality control" factor because it not only justifies strictness in the judging, but also keeps dumpy stepfile authors from dumping all over the game.
my biggest problem is that testing files in SM is not the same thing as playing them in FFR. there is a different feel between the mediums, for whatever reason.
and there are some times when a file tests well in SM... and then i go to add it to FFR... and i'm like, "hmm. this file could have been better." doesn't happen with every file, obviously. but there have been a few. and i don't see any way of avoiding this except for converting every single test file into FFR format and testing them on FFR... which just isn't possible.
its a combination of everything. size of the window, c300, size of the arrows, timing window, jack bug. etc etc etc.
there's no way to change SM to match FFR, nor vice versa. And I wouldn't want there to be.
and even still... there still would be files that got into the game that people complained about for one reason or another. EVERY file is going to get complaints. EVERY file is going to get praise. the goal is to get more praise than complains. thats it. if 1 or 2 people are constantly unhappy about every file, well, there really isn't anything we can do about that. we aren't going to change what we do to make those few happy.
Comment