Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

just so you guys know FFR is lenient as ****. on a scale of 1-10 1 being retardedly strict and 10 being retardedly lenient FFR would be a 6. before it use to be an 8 but things have tightened up a bit.

what most of you guys are doing btw is taking constructive criticism the wrong way. just because someone tells you to fix something you made doesnt mean it isnt yours anymore it just means you file had faults that needed to be fixed. how many drafts do you think any sort of planner inventor creator go through before they get to the finished whatever? many drafts. get used to needing fixes because no one ever makes perfect files. even judges with an assload of experience dont make files that make it in 100% of the time. so for all of you to bitch and complain is ****ing ridiculously retarded. remember you arent making files for just yourself you're making files for everyone.

on one last note the reason some files get rejected its because the song didnt have enough potential to make a great file and the best the song could provide was some mediocre piece off ass. the final hour has potential to be a half decent file. kayla chart for it was far from the best you could do with it and it showed. connect is another example for a song that has little potential. if you look at the notes for it there werent many nice things said. i unlike some people(this applies to everyone who has and will bitch about rejection) can accept the fact that the file will never be up to par with anything deemed worthy of acceptance. get over it you bunch of **** ****s, really.

none of you are making a really good argument btw. judging has always been subjective no matter what and it will remain the same. if you're really set on getting a file into ffr then just do what xandertrax did and submit the file countless times until it gets accepted(See devour)

Yeah... even though my file was rejected, that gives me more incentive to try and fix my mistakes. The judges are qualified to give you constructive criticism, so take their word for it. Also, just realize that it's only one file in the game... why is it worth making the entire community so dramatic over a few files?

[bob bob]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

****s goin downnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Hey, I know I need to fix mine. Just last night I was finally able to buy headphones. I wasn't able to hear stuff as well as I could have when I was stepping my songs.
But some of the things the judges said were out of line and some of the judging was ridiculous. That's mainly what this debate is all about. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[psychoangel691]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yeah... even though my file was rejected, that gives me more incentive to try and fix my mistakes. The judges are qualified to give you constructive criticism, so take their word for it. Also, just realize that it's only one file in the game... why is it worth making the entire community so dramatic over a few files?

-_-

Why do people keep going back to it being about particular files it's not. It's about the fact that we're getting too huge of a difference in ratings like the file with the + and the - sitting on it.

People please read through before commenting on things because this keeps turning into this huge ****fest because people are misunderstanding things. As I said before there's no reason we shouldn't be able do discuss how we feel about the judging/rating system without having a bunch of fu posts going on.

[krunkykai22]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Kommisar's system +5072459723458923745

[trumaestro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

woot the file i shat out got rejected raise the ****in roof

its k i've got an actually good file to send for next batch
When is this?

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

never batch is closed forever

like i said tone down trisection and v2 is a go

[Xandertrax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

lol. At least I improved Devour every time I resubmit it. It's crap like Winter Wind that got accepted first time through that should've gone through a bit more screening.

[Plan_Bsk81127]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

WWE ending.....what were you thinking. XD

[Xandertrax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Polyrhythms gogogogogogooggogo

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yay, mine's fixed. 48th gallops feel so much better than the 24ths
And I came up with another pattern instead of 44334433 than feels a lot more natural and still fits the song perfectly. Congas are now single jacks at the beginning and I just nudged the syncing a little. File should be amazing now, plus it's still fun.

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

So what will happen to bordeline files?


And... since the only problem in Capriccio 24 is the audio quality, shouldn't it be conditional or something?

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

btw im fixing files with actual mistakes and considering suggestions. although i dont think im going to do anything with waltz in the rain

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm going to consider qqwref's and sam's notes about Metro. I do agree it had some parts that could be improved (such as the ending).

So if you make fixes to a file, can you just send it as soon as you make the changes? Or do I have to wait until my file is put in the conditional queue list?

[megamon88]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

It amazes me how you guys somehow managed to make about 10 pages in one night.