Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[bob bob]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

64th/96ths?
O.O

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

You have to take into consideration that what might be synced on one computer could be off for another due to file transfers. It happened between Kayla/AJ and I and I showed them that a while ago. That's likely the situation.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Global offsets will **** with sync so that could be the issue(one more reason to use ddream)

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yeah if you have to adjust global offset, your PC might not be good for syncing.

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

If you use a global offset (at least in my experience), the assist tick will be wrong (in regards to where it should be to be in sync while playing) by whatever your global offset is. For me, my global offset is -.04, so if I sync a song with assist tick it's .04 (early), and once I add -.04 it's in sync for playing. You want to use the sync for playing as your final version that you send in, because that should work for everyone else. But then, of course, you get all the difficulties with the incompatible versions of SM and all that jazz.

Moral of the story is don't judge based on offset unless the whole thing's wrong

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I always use ddream to figure out correct offset

[DossarLX ODI]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Why are you guys so concerned about offset if the right BPM is used? If anything, you should be more concerned about the frame offsets for the FFR .swf file, because I bet a lot of FFR files *do* have the offset in stepmania but on FFR the files give early goods.

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Awesome!
Yo send me Phalanx and I'll send you Creature?

OMFG YES

*PMs you*

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Why are you guys so concerned about offset if the right BPM is used? If anything, you should be more concerned about the frame offsets for the FFR .swf file, because I bet a lot of FFR files *do* have the offset in stepmania but on FFR the files give early goods.

Yes, this absolutely.

One should not get dinged on wrong offset; wrong bpm(s) resulting in offsync that's unfixable by simple gap adjustment is when you should care.

[bob bob]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Why are you guys so concerned about offset if the right BPM is used? If anything, you should be more concerned about the frame offsets for the FFR .swf file, because I bet a lot of FFR files *do* have the offset in stepmania but on FFR the files give early goods.

yeah, sometimes the transistion to ffr isnt that smooth

like rage template before it was fixed

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yes, this absolutely.

One should not get dinged on wrong offset; wrong bpm(s) resulting in offsync that's unfixable by simple gap adjustment is when you should care.

Unless the offset is off by a lot heh

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

No it isn't and no they arent(they are but after you resync currently they're 64th 96ths)

hi baq12

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Unless the offset is off by a lot heh

I guess? You can adjust it yourself, but typically enormous offset differences isn't very common. I might have to press F11 or F12 one to three times, but usually no more than that.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Also, I'll get to the resubmits tomorrow.

[qqwref]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

A bad offset is a problem, but it isn't a problem with *the chart*. As long as there exists an offset which makes the song synced properly, it should be up to the person who converts the song to make sure it gets done right.