Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

You guys are incredibly fast.

[Emo_Saur_]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

We have a between the buried and me in the queue, sweet.

[trumaestro]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

We have a between the buried and me in the queue, sweet.

oh **** we have permission for this band

finishing old-ass wip for next batch fo sho

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

finished my notes, sending to beemah

OMFG I WANT TO KNOW HOW PHALANX IS!

(If you got that file...lmao)

[iironiic]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

finished my notes, sending to beemah

You probably ripped my file apart xD

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

lol you guys just have to wait for now until all notes come in

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

rejected

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Notes sent!

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

wow you guys are quick.

[Silvuh]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Bleep blorp, I went to bed before the batch was sent last night, and I just spent much longer than it should have taken doing this: .... so I haven't touched the batch yet ....

Another issue: 4 judges = new point values/variance...

Trying to take in account variance and disagreement and such:
I used the same curved standard deviation as before ...
With three people it was really easy to see when disagreement effected a higher or lower score, and it was kinda messy when I tried doing it the same way with four ...
Because that way, I got 5 5 4 1 being greater than 5 5 4 2.
So I came up with an equation based on "-a+b+c-d" to get something resembling a direction and magnitude of the standard deviation ...
The curve | ³√(2x)-1 | (with x being -a+b+c-d) is what I found to multiply the standard deviation by (so a value of 4 wouldn't change the standard deviation)...
But because Excel doesn't have an nth root function, I had to do some more convoluted stuff and I messed up with the negatives, and it took me a while to figure out what I messed up on and la la la etc. whatever ...

20 5 5 5 5
19|5 5 5 4
18 5 5 5 3 | 5 5 4 4
17 5 5 5 2 | 5 5 5 1 , 5 5 4 3
16 5 5 4 2 , 5 4 4 4 | 5 5 4 1 , 5 5 3 3 = 5 4 4 3 = 4 4 4 4
15|5 5 3 2 , 5 4 4 2 , 4 4 4 3
14 5 4 3 3 , 5 5 3 1 , 5 4 4 2 , 4 4 4 2 | 5 5 2 2 = 5 4 3 2 = 4 4 3 3
13 4 4 4 1 | 5 3 3 3 , 5 4 3 1 , 5 5 2 1 , 4 3 3 2
12 4 3 3 3 , 5 3 3 2 , 4 4 3 1 , 5 4 4 2 | 5 5 1 1 = 5 4 2 1 = 5 3 3 1 = 4 4 2 2 = 5 3 3 2 = 3 3 3 3
11|4 4 2 1 , 5 3 2 2 , 4 3 3 1 , 3 3 3 2
10 4 3 2 2 , 5 4 1 1 , 5 3 2 1 , 3 3 3 1 | 5 2 2 2 , 4 4 1 1 = 4 3 2 1 = 3 3 2 2
09|4 2 2 2 , 5 2 2 1 , 5 3 1 1 , 3 3 2 1
08 3 2 2 2 , 5 2 2 1 , 4 3 1 1 | 3 3 1 1 = 3 2 2 1 = 2 2 2 2
07 5 2 1 1 | 5 2 1 1 , 2 2 2 1
06 5 1 1 1 , 3 2 1 1 | 4 1 1 1 , 2 2 1 1
05|3 1 1 1 ,
04 2 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1

(( I put a pipe where XX.5 would be. Ones with equal signs between them are integers. ))

Standard sum:

20 5 5 5 5
19 5 5 5 4
18 5 5 5 3 , 5 5 4 4
17 5 5 5 2 , 5 5 4 3 , 5 4 4 4
16 5 5 5 1 , 5 5 4 2 , 5 5 3 3 , 5 4 4 3 , 4 4 4 4
15 5 5 4 1 , 5 5 3 2 , 5 4 4 2 , 5 4 3 3 , 4 4 4 3
14 5 5 3 1 , 5 5 2 2 , 5 4 4 1 , 5 4 3 2 , 5 3 3 3 , 4 4 4 2 , 4 4 3 3
13 5 5 2 1 , 5 4 3 1 , 5 4 2 2 , 5 3 3 2 , 4 4 4 1 , 4 4 3 2 , 4 3 3 3
12 5 5 1 1 , 5 4 2 1 , 5 3 3 1 , 5 3 2 2 , 4 4 3 1 , 4 4 2 2 , 4 3 3 2 , 3 3 3 3
11 5 4 1 1 , 5 3 2 1 , 5 2 2 2 , 4 4 2 1 , 4 3 3 1 , 4 3 2 2 , 3 3 3 2
10 5 3 1 1 , 5 2 2 1 , 4 4 1 1 , 4 3 2 1 , 4 2 2 2 , 3 3 3 1 , 3 3 2 2
09 5 2 1 1 , 4 3 1 1 , 4 2 2 1 , 3 3 2 1 , 3 2 2 2
08 5 1 1 1 , 4 2 1 1 , 3 3 1 1 , 3 2 2 1 , 2 2 2 2
07 4 1 1 1 , 3 2 1 1 , 2 2 2 1
06 3 1 1 1 , 2 1 1 1
05 2 1 1 1
04 1 1 1 1

I just colored them kinda based on how it was with groups of 3, so well, ... yeah, I guess this can be uh discussed later when when uh when, like, the batch is done and stuff and yeah.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Minimum borderline (most lenient case):

- At least 16/20 is required.
- At least 1 judge give 5.
- At least 3 judges give 4 or above.
- (5, 5, 4, 1) might be an exception.

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I gave 8/25 +'s and they were very deserving


anyone who asked about their files (custom and iironiiic)


in no particular order, so you can have fun figuring out which file got kommi approv'd

[+], [+?]


I played that beautiful diarrhea file too but it wasn't part of my batch

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I gave 8/25 +'s and they were very deserving

If you gave 5/5(+) on 8/25 files you're probably lenient.

or files are really that good?

[ichliebekase]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I played that beautiful diarrhea file too but it wasn't part of my batch

This made me lol XD

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

1 - ++ (kinda obvious what file)
6 - +
6 - +.

out of 27
Slightly more strict this time. Lot of fun files this time tho