Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

hello

P.S. Next batch, I'll keep my notes short and brief since I'm like the only person other than wc with a brick wall of text for reviews, lmao.

Only reason why I didn't put up walls of text is because I was trying to speed through this batch since this was from say...a year ago?

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Well, my comments about judgement distribution and strictness for every judge.

psychoangel - about right, "+?" and "?" could be used a bit more?
patashu - a bit too lenient in "+". "+." and "+?" could be used more.
kory - a bit too lenient in "+". "+?" and "?" could be used more.

wc - about right but should use "+?" more (corresponding to "Maybe").
v4n - ok
gdude - ok

silvuh - seems slightly strict overall, but about right.
halogen - ok
jx - ok

bmah - about right, "-" could be used more for bad files maybe?
ilu - looks like all or nothing, "+?" and "?" could be used more.
kommi - same as above, "+?" and "?" could be used more.

[Dr Tran]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

totally forgot about +? lmao yeah i wouldve used that for a good portion of the ?'s

also aj i like nainai as a song but the file was just really eh for me. could definitely get at least a +. from me with enough fixes and a cut


also im permabanned on my main account so replace with this one

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Another news:

I just got files from Nsane, and it was 39 files.
I'll verify those with files in current e-mail and count again.



ps lifted wc from p-ban.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

please note that i added one more submission to the resubmission than to what i sent to nsane

[championanwar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

My file isn't there, can I re-send?

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

those are the files that were sent to nsanes email address. if you sent your file to the new email then you should be fine

[Coolboyrulez0]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Thanks for clarifying guys. SF is going to fix it up and re-send it. It just seemed quite unfair to reject a song due to one's personal dislike of the music.
Cut and other comments are noted and will be applied and re-sent.

[psychoangel691]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Well, my comments about judgement distribution and strictness for every judge.

psychoangel - about right, "+?" and "?" could be used a bit more?
patashu - a bit too lenient in "+". "+." and "+?" could be used more.
kory - a bit too lenient in "+". "+?" and "?" could be used more.

wc - about right but should use "+?" more (corresponding to "Maybe").
v4n - ok
gdude - ok

silvuh - seems slightly strict overall, but about right.
halogen - ok
jx - ok

bmah - about right, "-" could be used more for bad files maybe?
ilu - looks like all or nothing, "+?" and "?" could be used more.
kommi - same as above, "+?" and "?" could be used more.

Yea I'm still getting used to the system over here for ratings. I got too used to the s,a,b,c,d we used on DF lol.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

only song that was rejected because of song choice was its raining lolis and it deserved it

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

@jimerax

please ignore the files I sent to NSane and use the ones I sent to the new email please

[kommisar]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

maybe i would use "has potential +?" more since I'm usually more tempted to reject or accept straight up

[Izzy]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

File submitted. Only file I've written in the past 5 years.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Currently we have around 40 submissions (without applying submission cap).

When the number of submissions reaches around 60-70, I'll post batch close annoucement here (batch will be closed 24 hours after that).

It's probably more useful to announce a deadline date for submissions once files from the now-finished batch are accepted (how's the status quo so far?) and presented to the public. After all things are considered, everyone else can send in resubmissions as necessary.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

So here's acceptance criteria idea.

(1) 13 or higher for Group1, 4, 12 or higher for Group 2, 3 (33 files)
(2) 12 or higher for every group (41 files)

As for this this time, (1) seems better imo. opinions?