Well you certainly can't say "you can't be tier 0 regardless of your tier points because you have > rank 50 on 1 song" if thats what you mean.
Everyone is good at different songs. Say if someone is left-handed, they have a huge disadvantage with ehhs. If someone is 3-finger, they will most likely have trouble with one minute waltz. just sayin
EDIT: also 1000% agree with ledwix's suggestion. they were looking for a way to shorten the top players list after all
To be in T0 you should be pretty damn good at every song, not just the 3-finger-friendly files.
Btw I'm left handed. EHHS is obviously not right hand biased, or not as much as you'd think.
I agree that the tier rankings have too many people in them now. I mean, I'm almost tier 4, not great, but I'm almost there. I don't think I should be there if I can't play FGO for ****. But that's mostly cause I'm 3-finger. HOwever, I will not change to spread, EVER. I will be the best PURE 3-finger player on FFR Smartdude can't say that now, he has some spread scores =P
I think the req needs to be raised, as there are getting to be enough people on T0 that I'm starting to not consider it as insane as it used to be.
the overall skill in ffr has increased. the reqs are right it's just the fact that there's more than just baha and shash now. there are quite a few amazing players.
Oh, and darkshark, smartdude couldn't get where he is if he was just three fingered friendly. 720 points is too ridiculous. he plays a spread variation of three fingered.
Also, since people seem to have missed what I think the guy was actually talking about here:
Originally posted by windsurfer-sp
Then again a T0 shouldnt have a rank >50, in some ways.
I rather suspect he was saying "If it took you so many games, that your grand total score is enough to put you in the top 50 by grand total score, then you aren't insane.
Implying that getting 720 tier points in 720 games is dramatically superior to getting 720 tier points in 25,000 games etc.
Comment